Demonstration environment. This is the same enterprise compensation solution we would operate in delivery, running on invented data. The live service runs on FedRAMP-authorized AWS and inherits that infrastructure’s controls, holding VA information inside the contractor system boundary that VAAR 852.239-70 and 852.239-73 require. Authorization for the application itself is granted by VA at award. Every figure shown is invented and is not VA information.

About this demonstration

What you are looking at, and what we can show you.

This site demonstrates the capabilities we would deliver in execution, running on invented data. The working platform runs separately on FedRAMP-authorized AWS, inherits that infrastructure’s controls, and keeps VA information inside the contractor system boundary that VAAR 852.239-70 and 852.239-73 require. Authorization for the application itself is granted by VA at award.

If seeing that environment would help your evaluation, we will walk you through it.

Request a walkthrough

Deliverables · Sample artifacts

Every report the PWS calls for — rendered.

PWS Tasks 1 through 7 name eighteen deliverables, and the Task 4 solution spec requires two more report-producing tools. Below is a sample of each, grouped by the platform work stream that produces it. These are outputs of the modules you can operate on this portal — not mockups of a future system. All figures are illustrative until the surveys are licensed and VA data files arrive.

Acceptance & delivery, per the PWS

10 business days — Government review of each deliverable
3 business days — Contractor incorporates feedback
5 business days — COR notifies final acceptance

Cloud-based or electronic delivery; MS 365 (Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Project, Visio) and Adobe PDF; every data file and report also delivered in a version importable to an external, cloud-based compensation system; documentation delivered within one week of completion.

Work stream

Program management

Tasks 1, 6, and 7 — the program-management spine: kickoff, the IMPS, monthly progress, and quarterly meeting management.

PWS Task 1 / Subtask 1.1 · Deliverable

Kickoff Package — Agenda, Minutes & Staff Roster

Once · within 10 business days of award · DOCX / PDF

Mechanism: Auto-drafted · PM signs · trigger — Award — meeting within 10 business days

Sample RMP-HSG-T1-001
Produced in Program / IMPS

Agenda — Contract Kickoff Meeting · day 8 of 10

  1. 1.Introductions — VA PM, COR, advisory group, contractor team
  2. 2.Intended approach and work plan, task by task
  3. 3.Project schedule review; IMPS due date set
  4. 4.VA data files, Teams/SharePoint exchange, and PII controls
  5. 5.Survey list review and participation calendar preview
  6. 6.Risks, dependencies, and communication cadence

Minutes (excerpt): “The advisory group confirmed the survey list baseline and the SharePoint exchange location. IMPS due date set for day 20; bilateral modification to follow receipt…”

Staff roster — as presented

NameEngagement role
Neil B. RileyProgram Manager
Jelani HouseEngagement executive · platform
Gilda Weech-HouseClassification & job architecture
Eric O. Leafgreen, CPAPhysician & clinician comp SME
Analyst poolSurvey operations · delivery organization
Platform engineeringECS build & operations · delivery organization

PWS Subtask 1.2 · Deliverable

Integrated Master Project Schedule (IMPS)

Living document · due date set at kickoff · incorporated by bilateral mod · MS Project / PDF

Mechanism: Generated from data · one-click export · trigger — Due date set at kickoff; bilateral mod on receipt

Sample RMP-HSG-T1-002
Produced in Program / IMPS

Base year, by PWS task — Gantt excerpt (WBS in MS Project)

1.0Kickoff & IMPS
2.0VA data collection, reformat, submit
3.0Survey purchase & analysis
4.0Enterprise Compensation Solution
5.0Job architecture, mapping, benchmarking
6.0Monthly progress reports
7.0Quarterly meetings & minutes

Months 1–12 from award (Sep 30 start). Full IMPS carries every PWS deliverable with Gantt and WBS; incorporated by bilateral modification on receipt.

PWS Task 6 · Deliverable

Monthly Progress Report

Monthly · DOCX / PDF

Mechanism: Auto-generated draft · ~30-minute review · trigger — Scheduled — 1st of each month

Sample RMP-HSG-T6-001
Produced in Program / IMPS

Status by PWS requirement — October 2026 (report 001)

TaskThis monthStatus
T1 Kickoff / IMPSIMPS accepted; bilateral mod executedComplete
T2 Data collection7 of 8 VA file types received and validatedOn track
T3 SurveysCalendar published; first 12 purchases initiatedOn track
T4 ECS350-user access model provisioned; SSO in testOn track
T5 Job architectureFramework discovery sessions scheduledStarts Nov

Issues arising & actions for resolution

IssueContractor actionStatus
SES schedule file missing from initial dropGap list sent to VHA WMC HR CoE 10/9; re-transmission confirmedResolved
Two surveyors moved submission windows earlierCalendar re-published; reformatting re-sequenced, no dates missedResolved

Due next month: November progress report · 3 survey submissions · Q1 meeting agenda.

PWS Task 7 / Subtask 7.1 · Deliverable

Quarterly Meeting Agenda & Minutes

Quarterly · DOCX / PPTX / PDF

Mechanism: Auto-drafted · PM signs · trigger — Scheduled — each quarter of the PoP

Sample RMP-HSG-T7-001
Produced in Program / IMPS

Agenda — Q1 program review

TopicLead
Deliverable status vs. the IMPSN. Riley
Survey participation & purchase statusSurvey operations
ECS adoption — 350-user rollout metricsJ. House
Job architecture plan checkpointG. Weech-House
Physician & clinician market movementE. Leafgreen
Risks, actions, next-quarter previewN. Riley

Minutes (excerpt)

Attendees: VA PM, COR, advisory group (6); contractor — Riley, House, Weech-House, Leafgreen. Discussion: submission windows met for all publishers in the quarter; ECS activation at 61% of provisioned users; advisory group requested a differential walkthrough at Q2.

ActionOwnerDue
Schedule differential-methodology walkthroughAnalytics teamQ2 meeting
Confirm FY27 survey list changes with VHAProgram teamDec 15

Work stream

Survey participation

Task 2 end to end — VA files in, duty-station-specific reformatting per surveyor, submission on VHA's behalf, and the published calendar the PWS requires.

PWS ¶2.a · Subtask 2.3 · Deliverable

Survey Participation & Purchase Calendar

Published and maintained continuously · Interactive / XLSX

Mechanism: Entry once per publisher per cycle · everything else derived · trigger — Standing from award; refreshed as publishers announce

Published calendar (excerpt — 6 of ~50 surveys)

SurveyWindow opensVHA data dueResults expectedStatus
National healthcare staff comp (A)Jan 6Feb 14May 30Submitted
Physician & APP comp (B)Jan 12Mar 1Jun 15Submitted
Allied health & nursing (C)Feb 2Mar 20Jul 1Reformatting
Executive & management (D)Feb 16Apr 3Jul 15Scheduled
Regional acute-care wages (E)Mar 2Apr 17Aug 1Scheduled
Benefits & work/life practices (F)Mar 9Apr 24Aug 8Scheduled

Maintained and published continuously; VHA is apprised of when each third-party deliverable will be received, per PWS ¶2.a. Window and results dates originate with each publisher's announced cycle under the Task 3 agreements; the internal deadlines are back-planned from configurable lead times.

PWS Subtasks 2.1, 2.2, 2.3 · Deliverable

Survey Submission Files & Transmittal Log

Per surveyor participation window · XLSX

Mechanism: Year 1 builds the crosswalks · steady state is run, validate, submit · trigger — Each surveyor window, from the calendar

Sample RMP-HSG-T2-002
Produced in VA Data Intake

VA source files received (Subtask 2.1)

  • Employee salary data
  • Duty station file
  • LPS schedules
  • Special rate schedules
  • GS locality schedules
  • Title 38 pay schedules
  • FWS pay schedules
  • SES pay schedules

Exchanged via VHA Teams/SharePoint; reviewed by VHA; contains no PII.

Reformatted for surveyor (Subtask 2.2) — duty-station specific

Duty stationCity / StateBenchmarknBase median
Tampa VAMCTampa, FLRN — Staff (A-4410)1,212$85,470
SF VAMCSan Francisco, CARN — Staff (A-4410)980$186,610
Houston VAMCHouston, TXPharmacist (A-5210)310$139,780
Phoenix VAHCSPhoenix, AZMedical Technologist (A-3120)184$64,240

Transmittal log (Subtask 2.3)

SurveyorSubmittedConfirmation
Publisher AFeb 11, 2027A-2027-08841
Publisher BFeb 26, 2027B-27-VHA-1204
Publisher CMar 18, 2027C-660212

Work stream

Market analytics

Task 3 and the Task 4 solution spec — purchase on VHA's behalf, aggregate, localize to every duty station, and put pay setting and AI review on top.

PWS Task 3 · ¶2.a · Deliverable

Purchased Survey Register

Per survey cycle · XLSX / PDF

Mechanism: Bookkeeping as a side effect of ingest · trigger — Each purchase cycle

Sample RMP-HSG-T3-001
Produced in Survey Library

Register (excerpt — 5 of ~50 purchases; the VA owns all survey data)

SurveyLicense termLicensee / ownerPO refReceived
National healthcare staff comp (A)12 moDepartment of Veterans AffairsVA-27-0031May 30
Physician & APP comp (B)12 moDepartment of Veterans AffairsVA-27-0032Jun 15
Allied health & nursing (C)12 moDepartment of Veterans AffairsVA-27-0033Expected Jul 1
Executive & management (D)12 moDepartment of Veterans AffairsVA-27-0034Expected Jul 15
Geographic differential report (ERI-comparable)12 moDepartment of Veterans AffairsVA-27-0035Included in purchase

PWS Subtask 3.1 · ¶2.c · Task 4 data spec · Deliverable

National Market Analysis Report

Per survey cycle · on demand from the ECS · Interactive / XLSX / PDF

Mechanism: Adapters built once per publisher · then automatic · trigger — Each results file landing

Sample RMP-HSG-T3-101
Produced in Benchmarking

Registered Nurse · SOC 29-1141 · National aggregate

4 surveys blended · 1,240 establishments · aged to Jan 1, 2027

$66,850
Minimum actually paid
$100,970
Mean salary
$97,550
Median salary
$152,190
Maximum actually paid

Published vs. actually-paid · reported rate ranges

MeasureMinMidMax
Rates actually paid$66,850—$152,190
Published rates$78,000—$132,400
Reported rate ranges$82,400$99,100$127,600

Percentile distribution

P10P25P50P75P90
$66,850$80,320$97,550$119,860$132,680

Total cash compensation build-up

ComponentMedian
Base salary (median)$97,550
Premium & differential pay (nights, weekends, on-call)$7,410
Bonus, performance & merit-based components$2,830
Recruitment / relocation incentives (annualized)$1,120
Educational assistance & student-loan repayment$2,400
Total cash compensation$111,310

Work/life benefits reported by non-federal employers: education allowances, childcare subsidy, remote/hybrid eligibility, PTO bands, retirement match — captured per PWS ¶2.c alongside the monetary components.

PWS Subtask 3.2 · ¶2.d · Task 4 spec · Deliverable

Geographic Differential Report

Annual · refreshed with survey purchases · XLSX / Interactive

Mechanism: Automated join · exceptions reviewed · trigger — Annual, with the data purchase

Sample RMP-HSG-T3-201
Produced in Geographic

Duty-station differential listing (excerpt — 8 of 1,193 locations · national = 100)

Duty stationCity / StateVISNDifferentialEffective
San Francisco VA Medical CenterSan Francisco, CAVISN 21191FY2027
VA Greater Los Angeles HCSLos Angeles, CAVISN 22139FY2027
VA Puget Sound HCSSeattle, WAVISN 20131FY2027
VA NY Harbor HCSNew York, NYVISN 2123FY2027
VA Boston HCSBoston, MAVISN 1109FY2027
Washington DC VA Medical CenterWashington, DCVISN 5105FY2027
Edward Hines Jr. VA HospitalHines, ILVISN 12103FY2027
VA Eastern Colorado HCSAurora, COVISN 19104FY2027

Drilled to city/state for every VHA duty station; methodology comparable to BLS; full listing exports to Excel and imports to external compensation systems.

PWS Task 4 solution spec · Deliverable

Localized Duty-Station Survey Report

On demand · any duty station, any occupation · Interactive / XLSX

Mechanism: Zero-touch · computed on demand · trigger — On demand, any of ~350 HR users

Sample RMP-HSG-T4-101
Produced in Geographic

Registered Nurse · SOC 29-1141 · San Francisco VA Medical Center

San Francisco, CA · differential 191 (national = 100)

MeasureNationalDifferentialLocalized
Median salary$97,550× 1.91$186,320
Mean salary$100,970× 1.91$192,850
P25 · P75$80,320 · $119,860× 1.91$153,410 · $228,930
Reported range (min–max)$82,400 – $127,600× 1.91$157,380 – $243,720
Any duty station, any occupation, on demand — exported to Excel with the differential applied, import-ready for external compensation systems.

PWS Task 4 solution spec · Deliverable

Pay Setting Worksheet

On demand · per pay action · Interactive / PDF

Mechanism: Four fields in · documented worksheet out · trigger — Per pay action

Sample RMP-HSG-T4-201
Produced in Pay Workbench

Pay action — RN (Nurse II) · San Francisco, CA

FactorInputEffect
Survey-anchored local median$186,320Range anchor
Experience — 6 years acute careVerified+2 steps
Education — BSNVerified+1 step
Certification — CCRNVerified+1 step

Standardized result

$178,400
Proposed rate
within survey-anchored range · documented rationale attached

The same factors produce the same placement at every facility — pay setting standardized across the enterprise per the Task 4 spec, with the survey lineage retained for audit.

PWS Task 4 solution spec · Deliverable

AI Compensation Review — Adjustments & Disparity

Quarterly · on demand · Interactive / PDF

Mechanism: Scheduled compute · human review gate · trigger — Quarterly schedule · on demand

Sample RMP-HSG-T4-301
Produced in Pay Equity AI

Recommended adjustments (quarterly run — excerpt)

OccupationCurrent avgLocal marketGap12-mo trendRecommendation
RN — Tampa$79,900$85,470-7%Turnover risingAdjust range
Pharmacist — Houston$136,200$139,780-3%StableMonitor
Med Tech — Phoenix$57,800$64,240-10%Vacancies +18%SSR candidate
HR Specialist — Minneapolis$84,100$82,600+2%StableNo action

Data + AI over survey, geographic, and workforce signals — projecting recruitment, retention, and salary trends, recommending pay adjustments, and flagging pay disparity. Every flag routes to human review; nothing self-executes.

Work stream

Job architecture

Task 5 — the implementation plan, employee mapping and validation in the ECS, and benchmarking with composites, trends, and outliers.

PWS Task 5 · ¶2.e · Deliverable

Job Architecture Implementation Plan

Due by end of the base year · delivered to the COR · DOCX / PDF

Mechanism: Human-led design · platform-assembled document · trigger — Base year — due by year end

Sample RMP-HSG-T5-001
Produced in Job Architecture

Implementation phases (base year)

PhaseWindowOutput
Discovery & frameworkMonths 3–4Career tracks & leveling model
Catalog buildMonths 5–7Job catalog (migrated baseline + net-new)
Employee mappingMonths 6–9Mapped employee files (5.1)
Validation in ECSMonths 8–10Job/employee match (5.2)
Benchmark & handoffMonths 10–12Plan delivered to COR

Career track × level frame (excerpt)

TrackL1L2L3L4L5
Clinical●●●●●
Allied / technical●●●●—
Professional / admin●●●●●
Trades & security●●●——

Due to the COR by end of the base year; the existing catalog migrates as the starting point per the PWS.

PWS Subtasks 5.1, 5.2 · Deliverable

Mapped Employee Files & Match Validation

Initial mapping, then per refresh · XLSX

Mechanism: Review queue only · the bulk is automatic · trigger — Initial mapping, then each refresh

Sample RMP-HSG-T5-101
Produced in Job Architecture

Mapped employee file (XLSX excerpt — de-identified)

Emp refOccupationFunctionFamilyTrackLevelBenchmark
E-04812RNClinical careNursingClinicalL3A-4410
E-19240PharmacistClinical carePharmacyClinicalL4A-5210
E-33871HR SpecialistEnterprise servicesHuman resourcesProfessionalL3B-1120
E-27455Police OfficerFacility opsSecurityTrades & securityL2C-2240
371,412
Records mapped
99.2%
Match rate in ECS
214
Exceptions routed
to VHA review queue

PWS Subtask 5.3 · Deliverable

Benchmarking Findings — Composites, Trends & Outliers

Per survey cycle · Interactive / PDF

Mechanism: Automated compute · curated narrative · trigger — Each survey cycle

Sample RMP-HSG-T5-201
Produced in Benchmarking

Market composites (excerpt)

CompositeInputsMedian
RN national blendSurveys A + C + BLS anchor$97,550
Pharmacist national blendSurveys A + B + C$139,780
Physician — hospitalist TCCSurvey B panels$316,000

Key findings, trends & outliers

  • Allied-health wage growth outpacing GS locality adjustments in 14 markets.
  • Nursing range compression at 6 facilities; midpoints below local P25.
  • Outliers: 2 occupations priced >15% off composite — routed for review with lineage attached.

Implemented in the ECS — composites, findings, and outlier flags live in the modules, not in a slide deck.

Work stream

Enablement

Subtasks 4.1 and 4.2 — the instruction guide, training for ~350 HR users, and the annual update cycle.

PWS Subtasks 4.1, 4.2 · Deliverable

Instruction Guide & Training (with Annual Updates)

Initial, then annual updates on an agreed schedule · DOCX / PDF / Training

Mechanism: Curated once · regenerated annually · trigger — Initial with rollout · annual update on the agreed schedule

Guide contents (v1.0 — excerpt)

  1. 1.Data definitions — every field, every survey component
  2. 2.Signing in, roles, and what each role can do
  3. 3.Running a localized duty-station report
  4. 4.How the geographic differentials were determined and applied
  5. 5.Pay setting workflow, step by step
  6. 6.Exports — Excel with differentials, import-ready formats

Training & update cycle

SessionAudienceMode
ECS orientation~350 VHA HR usersLive + recorded
Differential methodology walkthroughOCHCO · advisory groupLive
Refresher at annual updateAll usersRecorded + release notes

Updated annually with newly collected VHA and third-party survey information, delivered to the VHA WMC HR CoE PM on the agreed schedule (Subtask 4.2).

Every artifact on this page is a rendered sample. Occupations, wages, differentials, dates, and counts are illustrative — drawn from the portal's BLS-anchored demonstration dataset — until the surveys are licensed and VA data files arrive under Task 2. Formats and acceptance follow the PWS: MS 365 and PDF, every file importable to an external cloud-based compensation system.